Why a Wealthy Bad Guy Might Be After Me -- Mentalizing

 

The John Steg guy at Publix wasn't John Steg, but he looked a lot like him.  That's not a government official, that's someone who was selected and prepared to play that role for a brief amount of time by someone with a ton of resources, and no qualms about wasting their own money, which is not taxpayer money.


The question is, why would this person be going after me?  I think the answer is, they want to know what I did at DOD, and they think that because I'm mentally ill, I have the mind of a small child in a sense, and they can use their perceived talents--they feel, in their mind, very smart and "good with manipulating disabled people"--to extract the information from me.  If I announce, again, that "I will not leak anything classified no matter what," the person will take a pause, take a deep breath, retreat and regroup for a moment, and then try the exact same set of tactics again.  The person is more desperate to learn information that I will never reveal than I was about solving P vs. NP.


At the same time, just based on my intuition, I bet that if I did say what I was working on at DOD, the person would still continue to stalk me.  I can sense it...the person would never stop, unless I wound up dead.  So there's another goal--revenge.  The person lost some set of assets based on DOD/DOJ surveillance, and they think that I am responsible for it.  The person wants to make an example of me, but even more than that, the person is upset that something important to them was lost--a secret purchased set of resources/assets that the person treasured, that was apparently cut off by DOD.  Maybe the person is scared of what happened to Epstein, the sexual predator who was hurting children.  Maybe the person is scared that their own illicit predatory activities will be found out about.  Maybe the person has a large set of people that the person stalks and sends to "the circles of hell" like in Dante's Inferno, and I have been added to the list to make an example of me for fighting sexual and other predators.


Note, nothing I've said in this post reveals anything about anything I know from DOD.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more