This Looks Like Good News!

 

https://abcnews.com/International/ukraine-outshoots-russia-cross-border-drone-war-1st/story?id=131645399


I wonder if my publications contributed to help with this?  Either way, ABC News isn't making a big deal out of this, but maybe the Russians will start to be overpowered in the war with Ukraine.  Would be great news to have a post-Putin Russia!


Also, I'm increasingly convinced that it's 06-11-2026.  The Joshua Zelinsky code helps, I think he chose the date 03-08 to say something.  CC, MD.  (months, days; weeks, days).  He sounds like he is praising Dr. Caroline Coster in Virginia.  I think she was good, that's true.  Also, I think that Dr. Kudurogianis was probably good and innocent.  He was up against some forceful adversaries, I guess, and did all he could.  Cool.


What if it's 06-07, the other date mentioned to me at the H-E-B, by the guy who looked like the Henrico County cop and also Alan, the RA from CTY where Joshua Zelinsky and I studied as young teenagers?  That would be:  CY=BCZ, MZ.  That could mean, Chuck Yanikoski, Mark Zuckerberg.  Maybe that means Mark Zuckerberg is innocent, if it's true, and he wouldn't mind my paranoia and would be gracious about my confusion.  If that were true, though, and JZ admired him, then why did that "ai.php" thing happen to my account back in 2011 when I interacted angrily with someone I knew from college (I thought he was saying something about me and I was very psychotic)?  I suspect JZ isn't that fond of MZ.  Also, BCZ isn't that clear of a code.


So I think it's 06-11.  :).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more