"Out Tcs"

 

Maybe someone is saying, I'm "out" regarding TCS--three strikes I'm out?  Well, I don't know...I'm done with P vs. NP, for sure, but hopefully my two big ideas, NP in BQP and ZFC is consistent --> P != NP can never be proved, are "out" and known to a number of people.  Will I get credit soon??  Maybe they're saying, SCT Tuo...Sct in?  Are my supply curve theories liked?  I think my economics is good.  I don't know.  I don't have anyone to talk to about my economics ideas.  Maybe the "out" thing just means, the IC has been using my ideas to fight Russia.  Could be!  Maybe there's some nuance that would make that impossible.  I don't really know.  I'm glad to see that the tide seems to be turning against Russia in the Ukraine war!  I bet I did have something to do with that.


So maybe the lucky shirt woman was telling the truth.  The security weirdos will stop coming around, and maybe the woman who signaled me with the gesture just knows someone who knows who Brooke the nurse is in Florida or something.


Maybe they will come back though...I don't know.  I think I believe the "whisper 'hi'" women.  They seemed to maybe be telling me the truth.  For one thing, I wonder if based on their orders, the "bad guy" security people are supposed to treat me as though I'm suspicious, so they can't act friendly...they have to act like they're avoiding me because I'm "so demonic" or whatever, and so they don't act friendly.  The woman who stood on her toes at the H-E-B later walked near me and spoke to me, to say excuse me or something, and seemed friendly and willing to talk.  I didn't really have anything to say.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more