Nice and Mean H-E-B Signalers

 

I think the comment is, there might be multiple groups of people doing the signaling.  Do the signalers have a "secrecy pact" or other pact of some sort?


I think the key is, some of the signalers are being *nice*, and some of the signalers are being *mean*.  It can be hard to distinguish.  I think some of the elderly women who were doing very odd positioning of their lips were trying to be mean, and mock my mental health.  It doesn't affect me that much.  The kissy face and smile woman, who looked very attractive, might have been trying to be nice.  Maybe she is not a spy either, but just pushing back against the mean people.


I think the police have been called regarding some of the eccentric things that happen at H-E-B.  Probably, some weirdo started trying to gesture at me to be nasty--maybe it's someone who has friends or contacts with the Henrico County Police/Sheriff's Department, and maybe they believe the lies that have been told about me--and they stepped up to try to make fun of me and harass me and try to make me look/feel bad, perhaps predicting some sort of out-of-conrol enraged reaction on my part.  (I am good at being like a Spartan in the sense of the Spartan and the Fox story.  I am very resilient and process pain very maturely these days.)


Maybe someone found out about what the nasty people were trying to do, and just regular citizens--not spies--decided to react by trying to be nice to me.  That's my sense of it.  There are, I believe, *zero* official government representatives showing up, at least not if they're signaling me, because they'd have to be bringing fake IDs with them and they wouldn't want to call attention to themselves.  I think there is an investigation...e.g., the Houston police showed up to the H-E-B last time, and walked past me at 3:38 p.m.


The Sandra Hesse code *might* be real.  It might be August 4.  The other code, which seemed to be from South Florida LifeSkills, the treatment facility I was at before Monarch, was saying it was before January 1, 2027.  So I think something positive will happen...this isn't a minor thing.


So currently, I think:


 - some nasty organized crime / Henrico County government contacts in Houston

 - some regular citizens who are just trying to cheer me up


And:


 - zero good guy or official government signalers, other than perhaps the Houston Police

 - zero "private security" workers--my claims about Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg were admittedly ridiculous, I just was having trouble processing what is going on at first.


Anyway, I'm off to H-E-B again today at 3.  We'll see if anything weird happens this time.  I'll still take notes on any gestures I see.  Should be good food that I'll be getting, at least! :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more