My Activities For Today, 04-11-2026

 

I think things will start get better by June 11.  Maybe it won't be arrests or whatever else I might be thinking, but things will somehow start to improve.  I don't know.


I'm worried about this phone call I got from a pharmacy.  Apparently I'm supposed to enroll in some program to avoid having to pay a lot of money for one of my medications.  I am worried that I am going to somehow start getting sent the bills, which I cannot pay.  Before I sign anything, I will have to make sure that I don't start getting bills as a result.  The court ordered me in to treatment, so I believe that my (evil) parents are supposed to pay the bills.  I guess we'll see.  Probably, it's fine and nothing will change in a problematic way...I'm just a little "hyper-vigilant" and paranoid about things.


For today, I have the following things planned:  Playing Civ 5, playing one game of chess against one of the MacBook bots, and reading MWG.  I might skip reading MWG if I don't feel like doing it.  If I get into it, though, I'll probably feel better about it.


I think the government was trying to signal me.  I think there are a few private security bad guys who have signaled me, like the fake John Steg guy at the Publix grocery store, but I think they are highly outnumbered by the FBI agents.  I think some of the people at H-E-B are FBI agents, who are good guys who are trying to signal me.  I think the lady at the doctor's office, if she was really signaling me, was a bad guy.  It could be that I just misread her face and she wasn't trying to gesture at me.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more