More Mentalizing About the True End Date

 

I feel no concern about "being made to feel crazy."  It doesn't affect me.  I don't mind looking mentally ill.  I am mentally ill.  If people don't believe me, they are just wrong.


It could be that Dr. Glasser isn't intending to signal me.  A possibility might be, that Sandra Hesse is actually a DOD mole.  It could be that Dr. Steg's records included more than I was able to see...or maybe I didn't read all of the information he submitted.  My memory about what records Dr. Steg submitted to the DOD is not that clear.


It could be that all of the gaslighters are from DOD.  I don't know why they would come out to attack me, though...like strangers with candy.  Is it on behalf of someone at DOD who doesn't like me?  I heard that there were absurd allegations against me at DOD.  I won't mention details or names right now, but I truly didn't do any of the things wrong that the people were saying that I did.  The claims were laughable.


Do some DOD security workers break the law?  Are the people roaming around signaling me at grocery stores and on the street bad guys from DOD, running wild doing whatever they want and mistreating me?


I kind of doubt it.  That said, it could be that the best signaler was the person on X who signaled me based on something from South Florida LifeSkills.  The person put up "and always" before their account went away.  Does that mean, November, or January 1, 2027?  I think I get that it might be a Batman reference or a Maroon 5 reference.


Btw, I don't think DOD would do that.  They can't.  They have clearances.  Also, they're part of the same over-arching "intelligence community" structure that the FBI is a part of.  Thus, the FBI would be able to halt illegal activity taking place en masse by DOD personnel.  So it's not DOD, it's a billionaire with security, or possibly foreign spies...I think it's more likely the former.


Maybe the investigation is very complex, and it will take until November.  Maybe it will even take until January 1.  I'm getting old waiting for this to end!  I believe that the police were bad, and were trying to gaslight me.


One person at South Florida LifeSkills claimed that his wife worked for the FBI.  The other person said something to me about "you at least check your fridge once a day," and then that signal came.  Maybe that woman called the FBI about something that happened.  Or, it could be that SFLS called the FBI as soon as my spiral was stolen.


So was I signaled by the FBI, or by SFLS?  Maybe I'm on the hook to wait for November.  What a long wait!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more