Mentalizing the Minds of the Aggressors Who Are Stalking Me

 

I think I realized something.  The person who sent the "Sandra Hesse" code is someone who, in spite of probably not being a professional spy--more show-off-y and indiscrete--planted a spy at the mental hospital where I was treated in late 2001.  Dr. Steg was my doctor there, and the hospital was called "Dominion Hospital."


The person, likely a billionaire such as Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk, obtained access to my medical files, including a write-up from a non-doctor worker who said "Philip presents to be very intelligent" and "Philip's last multivariable calculus test was essentially perfect."  That is not verbatim quotes but that's pretty close to what was written about me.  I don't remember how I accessed that information...if it was something I over-saw when I was a patient there, or, if it was something I saw when I requested information from my doctors over the years when I applied to get a very high clearance at DOD.


Also, Dr. Steg said at the hospital that he really didn't like Sandra Bullock.  It sounds like someone planted a high-power spy at Dominion Hospital, and the spy managed to access my records.


So, this person doesn't mind if I "figure it out."  The person feels safe and invincible and impossible to arrest.  Probably, the person believes that Donald Trump would immediately pardon this person if he were arrested, and thus, the FBI will refuse to prosecute.  One key thing about this person is, he has a very simple understanding of other people psychologically...whether he has designed a highly used social networking service or not.  One thing Donald Trump likes is *deals*.  He was probably propped up into power by a number of people whom he has since turned against, such as Vladimir Putin.  He demands absolute unwavering loyalty and lots of contributions, often ones that require significant skill and talent, to stay in his inner circle.  He is arguably not as powerful as Nancy Pelosi.  The key will to fear is the will of Nancy Pelosi and Elizabeth Warren--politicians of the far future, not just of the next few years.  Donald Trump does not have unlimited political capital.  He has made a lot of people very angry, and has to watch his step to avoid angering the people who remain by his side politically.


Also, I think this person doesn't understand physical surveillance that well.  The person has probably bought some "state of the art devices" to ensure that he is not under surveillance.  There is a naive belief, perhaps, that the Snowden leaks ruined the power of the NSA and therefore also of the FBI.  The person feels ready to do whatever he wants, based on over-simplified analyses, influenced by mental illness, of what he can get away with.


Currently, I believe it's both Musk and Zuckerberg.  At present, no one at the Monarch Community seems to be a good person I could talk to about this.  I think all of my claims that people are following me around and stalking me would be framed as "delusions and ideas of reference," not worth investigating at all.


Oh well.  I think something has to happen eventually.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more