Mentalizing About the End Date

 

I am thinking about Robert Radin and his hint that my mother was "so disgusting" in 2009 or 2010 when he was my doctor.  I am thinking...I am not trying to insult any of the elderly women who made gestures at me when I was at H-E-B or the doctor's office, but, what if Dr. Radin would find their *conduct* or just "the way it seemed" that they were acting to be "disgusting?"  I don't think the FBI would *actively* send people out to signal me who would seem unprofessional or disgusting.  I think someone started some sort of "wave" thing about me.  I don't actually think there's a photo or description of me somewhere in Houston, TX, that I can't access...someone could find out about it and literally walk up to me and tell me about it.  I think there are a number of people in this area who are somehow signed up to be Russian spies or something like that.  I think it's a more explicit organized crime group--the fact is, there does exist crime that is organized and organizational.


So my belief is, I should listen to signals that don't seem "unprofessionally presented."  I am not out to insult anyone, even if they're evil, at this time.  I think the "whisper hi" might be professional enough.  I think the smile and kissy face thing from a woman who was at an appropriate age to make a gesture like that at me was professional enough.


Unfortunately, the two signals are:  FK IS nothing, KF IS something...which means I might have to wait until November 11.  The other signal was saying, "why f!"  That means June.  So maybe it's by the end of June.  I think there's some sort of organized crime family in Texas.  Perhaps the Henrico police and sheriff's departments have contacted that organized crime family, asking for help at dealing with me.


I had previously thought I was being too "hyper vigilant" about the signals.  I realized that, based on the sort of "Dr. Robert Radin side" of things, I have to be a little bit more Spartan than the average person...society expects me to tolerate and handle and process a lot more emotional pain and loss and waiting than the average person, and although that's unfair and even discriminatory, that's just the way it is for now.  Yes, America will look like it hasn't learned anything from the highly inappropriate treatment of Alan Turing.  Basically, right now, no one from Barack Obama to Abigail Spanberger to anyone else cares about that too much.  I will get the last laugh over Spanberger and Mark Warner when I sue the state of Virginia, and work to increase the damages I get on trial (if there's no settlement--I'd be happy to go to trial) based on the fact that AS/MW had every chance to intervene and help me, but chose to ignore me instead.  I predict that will end Spanberger's political ascent in particular...so that'll be nice for me.


(I'm still not talking about politics...no "work" or opinions expressed, no sides taken right now.  I talk about politics at the minimum that I can get away with right now.)


So that's it.  It looks like it's either in June or early November.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more