Maybe Their Plan Is...

 

It could be that the Houston police are bad guys.  I think there's a private security force, and the local police, and they're collaborating to try to destroy my credibility as a witness in my court case.  They want me to appear non-credible and highly delusional.  They want to present all the odd gestures that I've seen people doing as hallucinations.  I don't think that's the case.


Who wants me out of the way that badly?  I understand that my parents are very angry with me, but why would anyone with the money and resources to destroy me want to do that?  I think the answer is:  Because the person has some sort of deal with Russia, and wants the Russian government to succeed and thrive, and they see my work as having been a big negative for Russia.


That's my understanding.  These people who are messing with me are essentially, in some sense, Russian spies.  I think the Houston police might be bad.  The Henrico police is surely bad...I think they know that the police officers lied.  There sure is a huge lynch mob coming together to attack me!  There are a ton of people who are doing this.  I hope that law enforcement or someone else will help me out of this.  The fact that so many local residents are willing to do this kind of thing is crazy.  Maybe they are all just working for somebody, but I don't know.


Is that really what they're after?  They want me to look crazy, and to make it look like the psychological and psychiatric treatment failed to help me?  Why is that so important to them?  The number of people who seem to be against me is crazy.  I think it is a private security force.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more