I Still Believe It's Private Security

 

And I'm not sure I should trust the UPS guy.  The very wealthy bad guy placed a private security spy at Dominion Hospital, so clearly, it's possible that he could have put a private security spy at UPS, also.


I think the comment is, there's no "smoking gun" for trustworthiness here.  There's no guarantee that any source is trustworthy.  In general, there's a pattern to how the bad guys look.  They all do odd gestures--maybe to act like they don't have a problem with mentally ill people, it's just me in particular, and they always knew I was "one of the dirty/weak ones" or whatever.


I think the bad guy is Elon Musk.  I think the Houston police do believe me, because they seemed like they were looking into something at 3:38 p.m. when they walked past me this past Wednesday at the H-E-B.  Does the top bad guy think I, a disabled man, am the only person who notices that something is very odd in Houston, Texas, these days?  There are a lot of people with remarkably odd behavior and gestures walking around doing things.  The person who's doing this is leaving tracks.  Yes, due to the efforts to disguise his behavior, he could probably fool many therapists who hear about things like this from patients that are 100% delusional all the time.  Some people would not believe me.


There is no other explanation, other than, I am still 100% psychotic and fully hallucinating.  I don't think that's true; my psychiatrist, Dr. Poa, said one time at a meeting that I was "healthier than [he] [is]."  I think the visual hallucinations are gone.  I can't be sure though.  Maybe I'm hallucinating all the gestures at H-E-B, but I doubt it.  Someone just has hired a lot of little old ladies to work for their security company.  It's not word of mouth from my mother or a friend of hers in Texas, and it's not word of mouth from an employee at Monarch.


I think the best way to look at it is, the end date is by the end of August.  No one has been talking about September.  It might be August 8.


I wonder if the "whisper hi" women were correct?  Whisper, Hi, 2:56 p.m.  You could do that as WHY F.  Why, June!  Maybe not.  Maybe it's F WHY.  Maybe it's FY, WH--f--- you White House.  I don't know.  Maybe the women are saying, this is going to ruin Abigail Spanberger's chance at the White House.


It could also be:  pwersfeb.  That could be rearranged to form:  We're from PBS or M.  I had to add in a few double letters there, too.


What's M?  I think it means, the private security company.  It means they have been stego-poisoned into telling me the truth.  Maybe it's not a security company, maybe it's a secretive "security gigs" or "code transfer gigs" app.  It's either a private security company or a very popular new app that is shrouded in secrecy.  That's what I think.  Maybe it's a private security company that is M, i.e., helping Musk professionally but he doesn't like it.  Maybe it's a private security company that claims to work for Elon Musk, but it's actually run by Russian spies.  I don't know.


Anyway, those are my thoughts for now.  The thing is though, why would the UPS guy do the thing?  I think the comment is, he is not *unaware* of the fact that he is working as a corporate spy for someone else.  He knows what he's doing, he's there to spy on UPS.  He thinks he has a really good cover, and no one can figure it out.


Maybe the Alan guy who looked like he was chewing something was sharing the best estimate, since Elon Musk and other possible suspects didn't know who that guy looked like.  Wait...maybe they did, because maybe they planted a corporate spy at CTY too.


I don't know.  Which person was least likely to be a corporate spy?  Not the police.  Joshua Zelinsky is probably not a corporate spy...but I don't know what date he was saying.  Maybe September.  He said "says."  Maybe it's just not what I want to hear...the investigation is huge and very difficult, and it will finish in September, unfortunately.  That sounds believable.  Maybe I'll wait up for September 30.  =\

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more