I Don't Have a Clear List of Criteria For What Makes a Gesture Likely To Be Credible

 

Let me try.


1.  The person seems to be trying to say something.

2.  The person seems to know my name, or at least my initials.

3.  The person seems to be talking about something I'm interested in, such as the end date when I will be helped.

4.  The person understands the stakes and demonstrates that awareness...the person understands that if he/she is lying, something bad will happen to them for breaking the law (it's at least federal statute stalking), and so the person asserts that they are not lying.

5.  The person is not making excuses for their actions.


I think the closed mouth gesture woman was saying that she can't tell me.  Maybe she was saying, she would like to tell me, but she doesn't know and can't say.


The most important two codes that I remember are, the UPS guy saying "Go Han" and the women who whispered "hi."  HI + WHISPER, wtd --> PW, HI, SER.  Don't resign the chess game.  Understand the serrated knife.  What does that mean?  Are they saying that the fact that the wrong knives were photographed will help me?  Maybe the idea is, I need to get a different lawyer and ask if any fingerprints were found on the knife.  Also, I think my father's belly button was deleted in the fake photo, but I'm not sure...I don't want to look at that again, those photos were disturbing.  I'll look at them again if there's a court date set maybe.  It was at 2:56 p.m.  PW, HI, SRY, FE.  I don't know what FE means.  Maybe that's the date???  June 5.  Cool.


Is the UPS guy more trustworthy than the police?  Maybe, no, but they are both fairly trustworthy.  I think the Houston police don't know.  They signaled "NE" one time...I guess that means, they like game theory, and are just saying, they don't know and can't say.  Maybe someone tried to call the FBI and didn't get any helpful answer.  I am not trying to contact the FBI right now, it's safer/healthier for me to just stay here, have a little faith in the system, and keep to myself.


I think it might be June 5.  Maybe it was set to be by July 13 before.


The UPS guy didn't seem to demonstrate that he understood how risky it would be if he were lying.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more