I Believe It's Either July 13 or July 30

 

It is possible that I haven't been given the correct date in the grocery store.  It could be that it is too dangerous to share the date at the grocery store.  I noticed that a couple of the raspberry boxes were open.  I bought raspberries anyway, I'm not worried...but maybe the key is, if someone conveyed the date to me there, someone would do something nasty.  So maybe only gaslighters are showing up, and I'm supposed to understand that Dr. Glasser is sharing the right date on her website.  That might be true.  Maybe it just takes a really long time to do it.


Also, if someone in public wanted to share the date with me, they could just say, out loud, "July 13th!", and I would get the message.  It might be that the one day who signaled me with the closed mouth gesture was trying to say it quietly.  Maybe that's the key way to say it, but people don't want to say it, because they get followed home from the grocery store if they seem to be saying it.


I think the analysis is, the date doesn't need to be said again, because Dr. Glasser has said it.  The key to July 13 is, that makes it make more sense, because BLM is surely involved.  Dr. Glasser's photo went up about a year after the killing of the mentally ill man, Orvo Otieno; perhaps that was the time where she knew that some of her ex-patients were going to be arrested.  So it wasn't John Steg at the Publix, but Dr. Glasser's code is trustworthy.  She wouldn't lie.  Also, she seems to have written 1-2 books!  I found two books for kids on Amazon.com.  No need to not advertise that.


The last time I was at H-E-B, the gesture was, 7-13, and then, 7-13 -OC.  It seems that the first signaler was disagreed with by the second signaler.


The H-E-B staff that I see always acts professional and appropriate.  I think there might be a mole within the organization, though, that watches people on the security cameras and tries to get people followed if they seem to gesture at me.  Maybe not though.


So I'm thinking, Dr. Glasser's signal is in deed the most reliable one.  I guess, in particular, she is more able to do it, because although she has ties to Virginia and used to have her office in Northern VA right near where I live, she now lives in Maryland, and doesn't have to deal with Virginia police.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more