"Hot Lies" and the True End Date

 

I think both Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk are in on it.  I think the most reliable code is Judith Glasser's.  The alarm was sounded, privately, when the bad guys infiltrated John Steg's medical practice or Dominion Hospital's records.  The most reliable date is July 30.  Everything else is, as Nancy Pelosi may or may not have been hinting, "hot lies."  That's some billionaire's favorite thing.  The person isn't paying attention to the people in his security detail gaslighting me.  It's MZ or Elon Musk, someone who basically owns the security firm--the CEO of the security firm is just a "lieutenant commander" beneath MZ/EM in their own main company, most of their business comes from the CEO of the company they're doing security for.


There's some dopey security pawn who has a list of written instructions from the boss's office, and he/she actually casually and sloppily reads my blog posts and other writings, and sends out the message to the security pawns.  The person, who is going to get arrested, doesn't like his/her job, is doing this just well enough to satisfy the billionaire, and is probably also mentally ill like MZ/EM.


I doubt that it is July 13.  That's just another hot lie.  The FBI isn't stalling...the date is July 30.  It was possible to plant a mole not only at a mental hospital, but also at UPS.  The short-haired African-American man who said "go Han" was not sounding very friendly to me, and I believe that he was a mole and a corporate spy planted by one of the billionaires.  Why would one lone UPS man be the main reliable signaler of the end date??  Yes, you might say, "Why would your child psychologist from when you were 13 be your signaler?", but the comment is, I am aware of how much trust has been placed in Dr. Glasser, and therefore how much vetting she must have had over the years working with lots of different people's children, and it is probably possible to infiltrate lots of organizations, but you cannot infiltrate a person if the person is not open to it.  Actually, I spoke about concerns of this nature to Dr. Steg in 2001 in the hospital...I said that I felt as though "people are just like empty fortresses, waiting to be invaded," in the sense that I perceived people as immoral, disloyal, and very open to being influenced by other people.  (I don't feel that way any more.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more