H-E-B Gestures

 

I went to H-E-B today.  Aside from a police show-up that seemed to be unrelated to me, I only saw one gesture.  It was a woman who "stood up on toes."  I thought that was a gesture from South Florida LS...I had done a gesture like that in front of Nurse Brooke one time.  All of the other gestures stopped.  I bet someone was trying to act like they never happened, but they totally did.  Maybe someone else noticed and complained.  It could be, of course, that "stand up on toes" was a coincidence.  Why would South Florida LS want to signal me?  They didn't seem to care enough to help me with my legal problem when I was there, just like Monarch.


The code seemed to say, "Oust CT" or "Oust TC."  Maybe it said, "Tu Cost," i.e., you understand who the signaler was, because it was someone with a lot of money.  Maybe that's what happened...a number of people shopping at the stores noticed the people gesturing at me, and they started talking about it.  Maybe a description of me has been circulating.  In theory, that could be why the police showed up.  I had the police showing up at 3:38 p.m.  I had them leaving and turning on their red light for a moment at 3:34 ...I must have written it down wrong, it must have been 3:44.


Anyway, I don't know what to make of it.  I believe that the people stopped doing it.  That reminds me of that woman who was wearing the "lucky" shirt and said "hi there" when she walked past me.  Maybe she was saying, "Halt [in] April."  Maybe the claim was, the bad guys will probably be forced to stop in April, because someone will start to figure out who they are and what they are doing.  I saw the black-tinted car drive by on Sul Ross one night, with a California license plate...I think the comment is, someone has tracked the person who was sending in security to where they are from and ID'd the person who was doing it.  Maybe it's not someone I would expect...maybe it's someone less famous than Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg, IDK.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more