Evidence Fabricated With AI Tools

 

I realized today that my parents *definitely* used AI tools to fabricate evidence.  It's a horrible thing to do to one's disabled son.


Anyway, I've continued making progress on my online Python course that I'm taking.  I am going to try to get 100% on all of the projects.  I also have a plan to build 5 other web-based projects in Python to try to help me get a good job in Python.  It'll take a few months to get all of that done, but it should be worth it.


Also, I'm now on disability, and as soon as I get my first check of money, I'm going to try to find a new lawyer.


I'm also working on relaxing and feeling good.  Right now, I'm listening to this excellent relaxation music video, which I have liked for a while:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZYbU82GVz4&list=RD1ZYbU82GVz4&start_radio=1&t=1794s


My goal for my mood is to feel *triumphant* and *tranquil* for some amount of time every day.  Also, I am trying to congratulate myself on *making progress* on my goals.  My top two goals right now are:  1). Get the law case against me dismissed, 2). Get a job in Python.


I also want to finish my modular square root quantum computing proof, and I have made tremendous progress on that and the idea looks great, but I am not making that a top priority right now.  My mathematics breakthrough will be huge and will help people avoid disease and death in the future.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more