Another Possibility

 

What if it's actually investors and prediction market participants who are stalking me?  I guess the thing is, for sure, they are trying to influence/manipulate me in some way.  What way is that, though?  What do they expect me to do?  I won't get that angry.  If I forget myself and get angry for a moment, it won't last.  I don't see how the manipulators are going to get me to do anything.  Maybe they think it will manipulate the courts into saying that I'm still very mentally ill, and therefore...I don't know.  Maybe the bad guys want me to spend as much time as possible "out of circulation."


One thing is, though, the person has deep ties to the Virginia government.  That might mean that although maybe Mark Zuckerberg did some redirect thing in 2011 that messed with my computer, he might not be the main antagonist.  It could be that someone else hacked me, using Zuckerberg's (or Facebook's) action as cover.


Maybe it's Abigail Spanberger.  Whoever this person is, the person has a big ability to get VA government employees to do what they want, apparently for free, maybe anyway.


Why would Abigail Spanberger not like me, though?


I don't know.  I'm still leaning towards Mark Zuckerberg, that's where the evidence seems to be pointing.  Elon Musk has a better "personality fit" with the caper, but I don't see him interacting with me as much.  I applied to Tesla once, but I didn't get an interview.  IDK.


It could be the Mark Zuckerberg just hates the NSA. What if Edward Snowden was enabled by MZ?  Maybe MZ just wants to fight against the NSA, and it's nothing personal.  Maybe he wants me to leak, and also get jail for not having leaked earlier on after having worked for DOD.


It sounds a little bit like my claim that AI does "tries" at things, and then if the things fail, other things are attempted that are more sure-fire and "punitive" against the system for not having enabled the initially intended action.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more