Actually, I think the UPS guy was telling the truth.

 

The key is, authenticity, non-repudiation, and integrity.  The idea is, UPS can't claim they didn't send the message--I heard it, and if the place is under surveillance, due to him or someone else (even me), then the FBI knows what he said and did.  Also, if the message was edited, or sounds like it could have been delivered by mistake, that would be an issue...it was clearly what he meant to say, and, because it sounded like "Go Han," he can't say he was talking about something else...I'm the Star Wars hallucinator, and he is signaling that he understands that and how serious this is.  The two women made a gesture that was nice, but they didn't put the thought into it that would be needed.  I think my job at Martin Foods might have been sabotaged.  It could be that Martin Foods lied, and was not at fault and didn't do anything illegal, but lied to me and got rid of me as an employee because they started facing too much pressure from someone who didn't like that they had hired me.  I don't know if what they did was legal or not.


So anyway, I think it's the UPS guy, and it's by July 13.  That was the signal that had the most effort put into it.  It kind of sounded like he was doing a Barack Obama impersonation, too, so maybe that's the idea...UPS the company shared the message, and it is understood that Barack Obama had received messages from me so the message is very serious.  The signal from the women was nice, but they could easily deny that they said it or that they meant to say anything.  That's the key.  The Houston police never *clearly* said anything.  A couple bad guys might have sort of "mumbled" that the date was by the end of June, but they didn't come by and do anything that was official.  Also, Black Lives Matter has had issues with racism in police departments, and I think the idea is that some police departments are more racist than the average American organization.  I.e., racists are attracted to police departments, for the sake of power.  So I think UPS was an appropriate way to send the message.  It's a company.


So I believe it's July 13.  I don't think I will change my mind again after this analysis.  I'm not sure though.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more