Why the Houston Police Officers Were Suspicious

 

If they had been trying to send me the date, and they were doing it out of a sense of honor, they would have left their flasher-lights on for more than a split second.  Since I'm in distress, they would have wanted me to definitely see it.  So the fact that they were acting like they don't care if I see it means that they don't care about me or my outcome, which suggests at least mild hostility.  So I think that that is evidence that the police codes cannot be trusted.  I saw other police officers come by, and they don't signal with their flashers at all.  The clearest signal I got was 1:45 p.m.  That's Nash Equilibrium, and it doesn't appear to be a date.  There IS evidence that arrests are coming, because a lot of people are doing bizarre code gestures in broad daylight, apparently thinking that they understand law enforcement psychologically, and how to fool law enforcement officers.  Remember, the FBI and the police are not the same thing.


Maybe the Sandra Hesse HOLA code was an upper bound.  How old would Ludwig Otto Hesse be this year on August 4 or 3?  215.  So maybe it's BOY.


That reminds me of Dr. Bober at LifeSkills, one time I said, "I thought X meant Y," and he said, "Even though it doesn't mean that."  I wonder, am I misinterpreting all of the codes?  What if Dr. Glasser's code "doesn't mean that," quite simply?  The H-E-B codes arose in response to my request for codes.  Maybe I should focus on those codes the most.  In terms of cryptology, the protocol would make sense to be such that secrecy/confidentiality is not that important, but it would be sort of surprising if Dr. Glasser had predicted my request and gone out of her way to hire a lawyer and get the DOJ to tell her.


So I think, I need to pay more attention to he H-E-B codes.  I'm going to H-E-B today!  If you want to tell me the end date, I'm all ears for that!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more