Uncertainty About Codes and the True End Date

 

I think the most reliable end date is actually 07-30.  I think the DOJ might not have signaled me the date at all.  I think the idea is, the psychologist I spoke of earlier probably got given the run-around on the phone with the FBI, the same way I sort of did in the past (although I was wrong about my allegations back then), and then she got with a lawyer and did a FOIA request to obtain the needed information.  There might have been an initial denial, and then a court order--with a gag order involved and promises made about discretion--to get the information turned over.  I suspect I am not the only current/former patient of that doctor who might need to know that date.


I have been feeling uncertain about the end date.  Also, I just found out that my sunscreen only lasts for 2 hours, so I can't walk as much as I would have liked...unless I want to keep re-applying sunscreen, which I kind of don't.


I think I realized that the vast majority of the people outdoors are not friendly.  The guy who said "whazzup?" at 7:02 p.m. might have been unfriendly...he's trying to make me think he's some intense FBI guy who finally wanted to tell me the date.  I think it was just the hospital psychiatrist and then the psychologist that I saw when I was a teenager who were telling me...it's on or before July 30.


I think some of the bad guys scattered and ran when I mentioned the thing about them being like the "pedo-bear."  They don't like to see themselves that way.  I have begun to suspect that this case is related to Black Lives Matter, and, that there is a heavy organized mob involvement in this case.  I suspect that the mob might have its bosses and headquarters living somewhere else, like in New York or something, and the mobsters have infiltrated police departments across the United States.  I suspect that by July 30, there will be some massive arrests of mobsters, including mobsters who have infiltrated law enforcement, including local police departments and the FBI.


So that's what I'm hoping.  I'm also hoping that my economics ideas are rated favorably...since I'm not yet a true economist myself, I can't be *positive* that my ideas that I think are promising are actually all that great.  I think they're really good though...I guess I'll find out in the future!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more