Tonight's Blog Post

 

Hi, everyone.  I saw a lot of people walking by.  I took some notes on my iPhone of code gestures I saw.


I am not interested in playing chess right now.  I am also taking a break from MWG reading.  I will read more when I have gotten more (i.e., any) credit for any of my research contributions.  I like and respect MWG as very excellent academic authors.  I think it is important to be respectful to high-contributing game theory researchers and other people, including Nash, MWG, and me.  There might be some "special needs" for such game theorists, I wouldn't be the one who would know about that.


I thought I saw a code from the Navy saying, "I'm in winning."  I don't want to design any games right now, I'm hoping it's July 31.  Btw, if it is July 31, I *definitely completely accept* Dr. Steg, whom I think I saw at Publix, and Dr. Glasser, as having done more than their role to help me would require.  Why do child and adolescent psychologists have to be the ones who tell me when it's all over??  I bet someone had to spend money on a lawyer to get that information from DOJ, too.  Btw, am I wearing some sort of "government mask," perhaps to "keep the moles away"??  I don't understand this, but I figure I will by July 31.  I sure hope so!  Yes, I remember that the latest Jason Bourne movie was released on July 29 of one of those years.


Anyway, here's how to win against Russia and China.  You need to give them a "hello dossier," showing them that any future conflict is one that the USA would win.  Then, well-placed sources who haven't crossed the line too much and are seeking a better life in a post-non-democracy Russia/China will be prime candidates to be recruited to leak things...maybe everything possible...from the Russian/Chinese governments.  I shared one good idea on how to beat the Russians/Chinese in the future on my X page.  I don't know where the post is, but it was about "asymmetric randomness storage."  When quantum computers exist and NP-complete problems can be solved efficiently (double check the big O notation on that), it should be possible to use my idea from the post:  Model all of the Russian military/espionage apparatus as a Turing machine, hunt down all the random numbers that are stored in there with image recognition "oracles" and other technology, and basically, identify every source of randomness within the Russian regime, and use that information to predict everything the Russians do.  They would almost certainly unilaterally lose anything but an all-out nuclear war, and so if you can prevent them from nuking anyone, you can win.  (You could probably plant enough spies in Russia to sabotage their nuclear missile silos at some point.)


Anyway, that's the idea.  It hinges on the idea that the Russians will relentlessly surveil everyone who works for them, whereas in the USA, for example, a defense contractor could get a bathroom break to go flip a coin or whatever.


That's it!  I'm going to go for another walk, feel free to signal me if you want to.  :)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more