The Results of My Analysis!--I Think It's Over By July 30, 2026

 

I reflected on some wise comments from a former colleague at TexelTek.  The colleague said something about what he referred to as "the pedo-bear," i.e., a person who dressed up as a bear and went after people's children in inappropriate ways, like a pedophile.


I'm not going to mention this guy's name, but that idea was helpful to me.  I think his point was, there is no capability for so-called "pedo-bears," or any pedophiles, to get into the federal government's most sensitive organizations, including the IC, which includes the NSA, FBI, and CIA.


So that led me to realize that the people milling about giving me "comforting signals" are either *not even trying* to tell me the date, or, they are *predatory "pedo-bears"*, seeking to act like "strangers with candy" for me, a distressed thirty-nine-year-old mental patient.


So, do I have any instances of people that I know who are linked to the federal government?  I checked out some sources online, and found no one that I know of who is from the federal government who is signaling me, including the man at TexelTek.  The police, I believe, *could* have been infiltrated by so-called "pedo-bears."  The "adverb" of how the lights were flashed at me suggested that the police officers were moles of some sort who had infiltrated the Houston Police.  Probably, most Houston Police cops are not bad, and, the ones who showed up near me were some of the few (very) bad apples--"pedo bears" so to speak.


I wonder--after I write this post, will the people who are doing this feel shamed into stopping?  I already have the date.  I examined my first psychologist's website.  Judith Glasser's website photo has a reference to me--a spiral, when I mentioned "spiraling thoughts" to her when I was a young teenager--and a clock that says 7:30.  That made me realize, she is probably talking about me, and telling me the date--July 30, thanks!!  She didn't say the year, but I believe it's this year.


Dr. Glasser has a lot of trust placed in her.  She is very intelligent, and perfectly appropriate in her sessions with children, including me--I can tell.  She is very much *not* a "pedo-bear," a pedophile, or any other kind of sinister person.  I interacted with her enough to sense her high conscientiousness and at least fairly high agreeableness.  She is also not highly neurotic.  (I'm talking about the five-factor model.)  Thus, I think Dr. Glasser is the appropriate source for the date, and it's over on July 30.  She would never lie or gaslight me.  She might be unaware of the situation I'm in, but I suspect, she is, and she sympathizes and wants to help.


So I believe it's July 30.  I believe that Dr. Glasser is safe and will not be hurt by my post about her, which is a post that is praising her.


Alright, that's it.  Analysis complete!  No more signals about the end date are needed!  Feel free to signal to me about my research!



Addendum, added a few minutes after the original post was published:  It could be July 31, also.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more