The Good News About the H-E-B Sightings

 

I think that although the people at H-E-B who signaled me might have been lying, that it is good news that I am seeing those signals.  I asked for "code gestures," and I got them.  I think that means that my X profile, and hopefully eventually this blog, are getting a good number of views.


Maybe the people who gestured at me were trying to gaslight me.  I have seen a lot of people doing kissy faces at me.  One time I saw a woman doing that at Target at me.  Is that a friendly gesture, or a hostile/sarcastic gesture?  It seems that people are talking about me to some extent.  Maybe the people at the grocery store are not trying to tell me the date; maybe they sympathize a little bit but just don't know.  Maybe they were talking about something else in code.


The thing is, if people are willing to comply with my request to signal me in code...then why don't they want to talk to me?  I am fairly approachable and willing to interact with other people.  I'm not exactly requesting this, because I don't mind either way right now.  I just think it's odd that it seems like a number of people actually do know who I am and that something is up with me, but no one thinks to talk about it with me.  My "inner vengeful side" would say, "Good, no one will talk to me, now I don't have to feel sorry for anyone if me withholding my economics research leads to a nation-wide recession."


To be clear about that claim:  I firmly believe that my economics research is sound, far-reaching, wide in scope, and able to offer prescriptions and ideas to help prevent a recession in the USA.  It might even be good enough to help Africa!  I have a lot of good ideas about how to help Africa.  Unfortunately, due to my research discussion ban, I can't share them right now...I would maybe change my mind on it, but, the issue is that most people do not seem to take me very seriously in terms of what I say about things, perhaps because I'm mentally ill...no one would try to help me set up my idea for helping Africa economically at this time, so it's no big deal if I don't share the idea...sharing it wouldn't help at this point.


As you can see!, me not being able to get credit for my math breakthroughs has done devastating harm to my career, and by extension and my action, to people who might benefit from my research, because I am not sharing any more STEM research until I am fully given credit for my past work.  I am really a major-league injustice victim, in a large number of ways.  I think it is an anomaly.  I am one of the most mathematically talented people in the USA, and also one of the most hunted people in the USA.  There is no good reason for that.  My parents' bizarre preferences and predilections should not be honored--they are lying, abusive, nasty people, who use their education and resources to prey on people like me and drum up a small mob-like mass of people to hurt me.  So far, they seem to be getting away with it!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more