Night time thoughts

 

I did some more work on my economics idea tonight.  I came up with some surprising and very good ideas...I actually developed my ideas into a new equilibrium concept.  It's a very powerful one, too.


Also, I have found that thinking of this song seems to help my mood quite a bit:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgVWFdDnSXQ&list=RDSgVWFdDnSXQ&start_radio=1


It's a good song for walking around doing nothing outside.  It helps you feel more content and happy and "in the right place" when you go for long walks alone.


I am feeling alright tonight.  I took my meds a little while ago.  I ate a lot of Mediterranean diet foods.  I ate one more quesadilla this evening...I had just enough Mexican cheese left in one of my packages from H-E-B that I had bought.  I hope I don't gain weight...I'll find out tomorrow.  Also, unless I hear from AutoNation by 3 p.m., I'm going to accept the offer from WIS International tomorrow.  I also have a group to go to at 11 a.m.  Other than that my day is free.


I am currently thinking that, given that I have seen "kissy face" in a number of places, that the ordeal will be over by June 11, 2026.  FKTZ.  I don't know what the federal government is waiting for.  Maybe it's not over until June 26, 2026.  It could be that the people who show up to make kissy face gestures at me are part of some sort of organized crime group.  I wonder what they know about me?  Have they seen me online?  Or have they received a description of me from mobsters in Virginia?  It seems unlikely.  Maybe it's a trend, and people make kiss-like gestures at people at random all the time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more