My Evening

 

My evening tonight went pretty well.  I felt that there were some people walking around outside who are trying to "overwhelm me with codes."  I have no idea what church or whatever those people are linked to, or where the heck they are coming from.  I don't mind that they might be "making me look crazy/eccentric"...that's nothing new and I don't mind being seen as odd.  It doesn't change anything about my life if I repeat other people's odd behavior, in the sense that they are very interested in coming by and "depositing a cryptic gesture" with me, perhaps to sabotage or influence me in some way, without introducing themselves or saying who they are or what they want.  Maybe it's all my imagination--symptoms related to ideas of reference from my disorder--but I don't think it's entirely that.  The idea is, I asked for cryptic gestures at the grocery store, and I got them...and now these people start showing up on my street doing more gestures, ones that are less productive.


I don't know what planet any of these weirdos are from.  I bet they feel super-intransigent and "part of something big."  Whatever.


In case anyone is wondering what exactly I want, and why I am resorting to ask people to signal me at grocery stores to help me feel better and/or get it:  I want 1)  For the totally bogus charges against me to be dropped and the liars who created fabrications to get me accused and held for months to be arrested and charged with the serious crimes they have committed, and 2)  For my research, especially the Godel's Lost Letter problem solution, to be highlighted and for me to get credit for it.


That's it!  Everything else I can handle myself.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more