More Mentalizing Regarding the End Date

 

If it's July 30, then it's 250 years and 26 days after July 4, 1776.


It could be a reference to the US Constitution, including all of my rights that were violated.  Maybe the people think that the government can't do anything about it, because it's a violation of Constitutional rights and they can't think of what crime they would be charged with.  I can:  Obstruction of Justice for one.


Maybe the bad guys' analysis is, innocent people go to jail all the time, and some of them are black, but BLM hasn't targeted them and the DOJ hasn't arrested them in certain other similar cases that they believe to be the same thing.  Maybe that's why someone mentioned Kurt Vonnegut...the claim is, it shouldn't matter if I have a chess rating of 2500 at arguing, my protection to certain other people that this has been done to should be the same, they reason.  The people who have done this think, they really *are* too subtle to be arrested, and the coast is clear, and I'm the same thing as so-and-so that they also did this to.


I think the comment is, this case is different because of the motive.  They are doing it based on hatred of disabled people, and foreign espionage...but the bad guys think, no one can prove that.  I think the comment is, the ordinary safeguards that protect everyone from being prosecuted incorrectly were breached and damaged, so people are wondering why the coast is clear.  Ordinarily, the case would have been dropped right after I was charged.


Also, there's the "pedo-bear" theory.  If these guys are Russian spies, what exactly are they after?  Money?  Or access to something evil that they think that only a foreign government could provide them with?


Anyway, I'm tired of thinking about this right now.  I suspect the people who do this have some vague, hand-wavy idea that "oh yeah that happens to a lot of people all the time," and they don't understand that wrongful convictions are fought very aggressively in all cases, regardless of ethnicity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more