Maybe the Claim Is...

 

Maybe the claim is that the date is politically correct, and that in general, the FBI does a lot of arrests and activities, and they don't usually wind up subjecting themselves to political criticism, i.e., not many people will be upset by the end date not having been revealed in advance.  In general, the FBI does not generate too much controversy.  You could say, "an investigation being done by federal law enforcement is such that the extent to which the investigation is federal is correlated with low controversy."  If the investigation is being done by state/local police, it might be more controversial.  I do know that BLM is not happy with some of the work by the DOJ regarding certain cases where the federal government chose not to pursue charges against people accused of murdering black people.  Maybe the claim is, there is no federal investigation, but the news media will run a story on it soon.  Maybe it is supposed to be done by the state/local law enforcement, and they're not doing it, and the news media will run a story on it.


Also, it might be that some journalists know when the end date is.  Maybe there are agreements between correspondents for news media and government officials, that the journalist will not repeat information about the end date before it happens.


So here are some additional things to think about:


 - What does the news media think of this?

 - Is the FBI investigating at all?  Even if not, can't I get credit for my breakthrough posts on my blog somehow?  I'm not convicted yet.  Why doesn't anyone write to me about my blog posts?  Is there something that forces people to be silent and "gagged" in person, and do only deniable gestures?  In particular, my claim about quantum computers and NP-complete problems and AI should be big news.

 - Are there a few people who know the date?

 - Why is the communication that I receive from people outside of The Monarch Community so strange?  I definitely get signals from H-E-B.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more