Looking Forward To the Future -- Is It Over On May 19?

 

I am still contemplating the H-E-B codes from yesterday.  I think one of them was saying, "f--- u X", and the other one was saying, "W[in] 5-19."  I am thinking that maybe I will get some support in the court case that I'm dealing with by May 19.


I wonder if this has happened to people of color, too?  I don't think that people of color should get less help and assistance with court case issues where the person is being treated unfairly...I hope no one thinks that I am trying to "cut the line" or "shove my way to getting help" in a way that people of color cannot do.  I have never heard of this sort of thing happening to anyone else, of any ethnicity...what exactly made this happen in my case?  There is this brazen coming together of crooks from different courtroom roles, from plaintiff-type ordinary citizen to defense attorney to judge and beyond, and there is an agreement that  the people are going to team up against me and deny me my rights, and use what may be highly Photoshopped or other AI-altered evidence to try to string up a noose and lynch me, without regard for what really happened.


Maybe it's something that most people who are targeting people of color can't do.  My father, who is likely the ringleader of this effort, has experience having worked for the Department of Justice's organized crime division.  He also has experience, I think, in working for the JDR (Juvenile and Domestic Relations court) as a state-employed child support attorney.  So he knows the legal ropes.  Maybe the issue is, this is a one in a million event, where someone with a very particular background does something wild and crazy and evil.  Maybe it is not possible for most people who are racist who want to target people of color to orchestrate something as sophisticated as this.  Also, we are close to the dawn of the AI era; the police probably felt comfortable lying because they believed that my father would back them up with AI photos and audio recordings, which he probably did.  It might be that some of the AI services are ones you have to pay for; my father has admitted in the past that he really likes "gadgets" and computers.  Perhaps he had fun trying to get my life ruined, to try to clear his name of having abused me when I was severely mentally ill.


Anyway, I'm hoping for the best in my court case.  I will look forward to May 19, cautiously.  I might hire a lawyer before then if I need to.  I, and all courtroom defendants, should not be "left on my own" to sort out what to do on my own.  Justice must be done, even if I can't afford a lawyer yet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more