I Would Tend To Believe That June 7 Is the Most Appropriate Date

 

If there is a big billionaire getting arrested, he'll probably get arrested on June 7.


Unless, of course, the billionaire is expecting that as a possibility, and will assume that "the coast is clear" as soon as June 7 passes without him getting arrested, and allow more evidence of his wrongdoings to come to light.


I think the police, in general, is not new to big-money people living here.  Probably, the Henrico police were awed and impressed that a billionaire noticed them.  The Texas police are more serious and stressed out...I see on their X page that they have interactions with murderers who kill people with guns almost every day.


So I'm thinking that Dr. Glasser is correct that it's over by July 30.  The billionaires might think I'm kidding, lying, or hallucinating regarding the police turning their flashers on.  I bet it's by 6-29 at the latest.  It might be over by 6-26.  I wonder what the end will look like and/or feel like?  It could be that I will not see any of the arrests, and I will just see something big on the news.  The "trend" has been that FBI agents don't talk to me, so maybe that will continue....IDK.  It's not a huge deal.  6-29 means, there are about 1-2 moles on the police force.  6-26 means, the Houston police are mostly mole-free, or, no moles cared enough to attack me with a date lie.


It could be that someone's private security actually infiltrated the Henrico county police.


I think it's by 6-26.  Maybe exactly 6-26...maybe sooner.  I doubt I am being given the exact date.  The exact date might have been arrived at using a random number generator.  That might make sense from a game theory stand point.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more