I Got These Two Codes Outside Today

 

The two codes were:


CC:  LU UMW

and

Model


Maybe the question is, do I see myself as a math modeling person?  UMW offered a class in math modeling, but I never took it.  I see myself as very creative, and very good at figuring out ways to apply mathematics concepts to real life.  I see myself as a budding young economics student, and as a very good but bored applied mathematics practitioner.  I don't see that many more ways for me to make a difference with applied math.  I would like to go to school in economics.  My friend at Monarch, Dana, applied and got into grad school, and she told me that as part of that she is required to take/re-take some undergraduate level classes.  So perhaps I should just go straight for grad school...the problem is, I can't get into graduate school if none of my work has been looked at and *officially* been evaluated as "very good."


Right now, I'm assuming there's no way to go in terms of getting a job to hire a lawyer to get out of here.  I am waiting to get on disability, so that maybe I could get a car or a real lawyer, but even more than that, I am waiting on law enforcement to arrest the perpetrators in my case.  If that doesn't happen, I'm going to be stuck.  The lengths the bad guys went to to screw me over are huge.  My own parents want to destroy my life.  I can't fix this on my own.  If you told me, "Philip, do it yourself," I would say, "No, I tried that, but I can't."  Sometimes people do need and deserve help, and this is one of those times.  I need help.  I can't do everything on my own, that's ridiculous.  I'm *supposed* to have "inalienable Constitutional rights," where's the group of people screaming in dismay that I've been denied all of them?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more