Economic Help Ideas For the UK and France

 

It is possible that even if my math work is examined and discussed in the news, that my economics ideas will be ignored.


Just today, I developed some great "policy ideas" that could help the French and UK governments.


If it turns out that no one is interested in my economics ideas, then if I ever get help from the FBI but my economics research is ignored, I might try to run for public office and use some of my ideas to benefit my constituents.  I might not do it.  But it's something I could do with my life and my time if I can't make it as a research economist.


So I have 5 total things to share:  a)  brief P vs. NP and quantum computing commentary, b)  theorem that would help Israeli-Palestinian conflict (I will definitely publish this to my blog after P vs. NP is checked, even if it seems there is no interest in my economics...this could help even if it's only known to intelligence agencies mainly), c)  big new ideas about economics including a big important new equilibrium concept, d)  economic help related to currencies, for Vietnam and other countries struggling to get going in terms of the strength of their currency and their economy, e)  an excellent policy idea that would help France and the UK to strengthen their economies; also, this idea, which is based on economics but not that "research-y," might help the economies of developing nations, too.


That's it for now!  I broke my rule of only using the internet twice a day (morning and night) to publish this.  I'm not going to check email or Reddit right now.  As a brief personal update:  I predict that the WIS job will fall through due to non-response regarding my question about the IP agreement, and I will get on disability and go from there.  I might get a job after I have used my disability money to purchase a car--that's a possibility.  I had my psychology interview for disability yesterday.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more