Another Possible End Date: April 27, 2026 -- Patrick Stump's Birthday

 

There are some similarities to the claim against me and Fall Out Boy's music video, "The Phoenix."  Also, if it's over on April 27, that means the police and many of the grocery store shoppers were not lying.  It is possible that strangers lied to me, though.  I can't tell who most of the signalers are, so it's wiser to stick to Dr. Glasser, the Houston Police, and Dr. Zelinsky.


I got an email form Dr. Michael Sipser a long time ago that said "16", i.e., 16 years of research.  Like Dr. Zelinsky, Dr. Sipser is a very prominent Jewish mathematician in the USA.  Scott Aaronson is also, but I haven't emailed him in a long time, and I am suspicious that Dr. Aaronson might have tried to sabotage me by claiming that my GLL proof was "already known."  Maybe he was trying to imply that he believed I stole it from the DOD.  That's actually impossible, because I published the first idea about that proof in February 2009, after Dahlgren, which is a navy base, but before any other employment.  I had no access to steal that kind of work.


So:  SAY IN PS.  Patrick Stump, whose birthday is 04-27.  It will be his 41st birthday.  DAZZ...dazzled?  A prediction about how people will feel about my STEM publications?  Cool.


DV from CH yields July 30; AS from CH yields April 27.  I first found out about Rachel Bloom, the comedian, from JZ's blog.  Amy Schumer is another good Jewish comedian.  I don't know which one I like more, but I really liked "Cat Park" by Amy Schumer; it reminds me of working for the US government as a DHS contractor, as does "Long-Haired Businessmen," the YouTube show.  I like "Hanukkah Honey" and "F--- Me Ray Bradbury" the most of Rachel Bloom's songs.


I like a lot of songs by Fall Out Boy, too, including Champion, Centuries, The Phoenix, Save Rock & Roll, and a few others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more