A Possible Motive: The Bad Guys Are Trying To Spoof Being Secret Service Agents

 

It could be that the effort to smear me has taken the form of people following me around and doing nasty things to me to make people think, "Well, if by his own admission he's being stalked by a large, resourceful organization, then he must have done something very wrong!"


That isn't true.  I haven't done anything wrong.  I am not a criminal and I have not made any threats to the President or anyone else.  The only crime I'm accused of is based on fabricated evidence.


Whoever is sending the bad guys spies around, it is someone who has a sense of personal exceptionalism, and low other efficacy.  It is someone who thinks that most Americans are very stupid, and will jump to incorrect conclusions based on their manipulations.  It is a person who enjoys "Wiley Coyote like" battles of wit.  I don't know who it is though.  It would appear to be, either a foreign leader or an American with a lot of money.  In theory it could be my parents...my father might have been funneled a fortune through his camera book business.


It could be that someone thinks that the people following me around and gaslighting me is somehow "evidence" that I am a bad person and must have done something to deserve that amount of wrath.  I think the person who is doing this is desperate to learn more about what I did at the DOD.  I am not going to leak anything about that.  It is a waste of resources to try to get me to "blow up" or whatever.  In particular, I have been through this exact same thing before, when I was fully psychotic and thought that "there was an end date" and I saw repeatedly that it was not true and that was very agonizing to me.  If I did not leak anything back then, then surely I would not leak anything this time.  I am not psychotic any more, I have been to anger management therapy, and I will not have any sort of collapse or emotional melt down based on a date lie after the date in question passes.


So we'll see if this "wealthy individual" continues to waste his/her resources on lies.


I think Josh Zelinsky wouldn't say "CU."  I think he is thinking that the date is July 30, and maybe he found out with a lawyer too...it could help him with his personal safety, and it might help him with his investment portfolio if he buys and sells stocks on the stock market.  It isn't insider trading to use information you know about future arrests.


I think it's DV--July 30, like Dr. Glasser said.  I don't think it's DW, because that fails the Joshua Zelinsky test.  He wouldn't like David Webb from the Bourne movies all that much.


It seems to be 2-1.  I think the Houston police are lying.  Zelinksy and Glasser seem to be signaling July 30, and the police are saying it's sooner, perhaps to try to provoke an "anti-police outrage fit" that they think will make me look bad...or that they think will make me leak something.  I suspect that the police in Houston, in some cases, have links to organized crime.  I think most of the police are good, but those police officers do not know the date.  There are a couple of moles at least.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Math Update: My P != NP Proof Might Be Correct!!!!! -- (update, no it's not, see the note at the beginning and the updates near the bottom)

EDIT:  No, this proof is not correct.  See the updates at the bottom for details on why (based on Dr. Zelinsky's comment).  Fortunately, my GLL proof and MSR proofs still appear to be correct. It could be that Joshua Zelinsky's comment actually helps me to complete the proof. The GLL proof appears to be correct, AFAIK. The thing is, the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent --> P != NP" within PA and the fact that we can prove "PA is consistent" as a theorem of ZFC just shows that P != NP is a theorem of PA.  That isn't a contradiction, it's just another step in the proof. I think the striking idea is, P != NP is a theorem of PA, but not of ZFC.  That is what I worked to prove.  AFAIK it is possible for a proposition to be a theorem of PA but not of ZFC.  In particular, PA can be proved consistent from ZFC, so we would think it s possible and even likely that there are some non-theorems of ZFC that are theorems of PA. So this is great!  It l...
Read more

Hello, Texas - A Quick Monopoly Lesson

  So today, I thought I saw some people running around blurting code gestures at me.  One of the codes seemed to say, "Riot for a[buse] v[ictim] time -M".  Oh, M?  M as in Monolith, or M as in Monopoly fan who doesn't get it? Here, Houstonian code-talkers...let me teach you how to play Monopoly, since you are so hungry for free knowledge:  - Make deals with other players that benefit you.  - Offer deals to difficult players that are somewhat beneficial to them, knowing that they might reject.  - Watch which deals other players reject, and identify what *deal types* they are not likely to accept from you or anyone else.  - Be very very careful about your own deals--and behavior--lest you get figured out by your opponents and backed into a corner, with good, beneficial deals being made without you by cunning adversaries who know your every move. There's a poker lesson in there, too, but I don't want to get too educational right now.
Read more

Flash Non-Fiction: James Bond and Masculinity

  This was going to be a longer essay, but I decided to just blurt out my point rather than trying to write well. Basically, I think James Bond movies are good, and the songs are high-quality too, but it sends semi-dangerous messages to men in particular about what it means to be a man.  The Bond character is intransigent, aggressive, violent, and absolutely sure of himself in all cases.  He is portrayed as a big winner--able to date and have sex with beautiful women, almost impossible to kill, and lethal and elite at both armed and unarmed combat. I'm concerned that some men, including my estranged father ASW, have had their sense of morality warped by Bond movies.  They think that this dramatically presented way to be masculine is the only way.  I think that's unhealthy, and when people get the not-so-original idea to "try to be more Bond-like" in their personal lives, that leads to catastrophic conflicts with and major potential for deep pain for people that ...
Read more